Source: Infected Tube
Paul Starr was a senior advisor for health care reform under President Clinton, and he’s the author of a celebrated history of the American health care system, The Social Transformation of American Medicine. He has weighed in on the current health care debate in a New York Times op-ed piece.
In addition to commenting on the public option (it would enroll too few people and cost too much) and letting states run health exchanges (too many states would resist), he points out the importance of accelerating the timetable for reform. His concerns are similar to those raised last week by Maggie Mahar (emphasis added).
For Congress to put off expanding coverage to 2014 would be asking for a lot of patience from voters. It would also give the opponents of reform two elections to undo it. President Obama would have to run for re-election in 2012 defending a program from which people would have seen little benefit.
To speed the process, the legislation ought to give states financial incentives to adopt the reforms on their own as early as mid-2011. … The final deadline for the federal government’s expansion of coverage should be no later than Jan. 1, 2012.